Thursday, June 21, 2007

Media and justice equal? Part 2 - 6.21.2007.2

Continued from Media and justice equal?

“For the last year we have seen anger in white men about the miscarriage of justice they claimed occurred against these kids. In the last year they have had a chance to get a taste of the imbalance that can occur when a prosecutor decides he wants to go after a defendant. They got a glimpse of what Black men get all the time.”


But I am not the only voice in this matter. I have not been the only one to question the ‘innoccence’ of they boys. Has everyone forgotten that this incident started because these ‘upstanding young men’ decided that they needed to call an escort service to have women perform sex acts with a broomstick, while they engaged in under-age drinking?

“… ive decided to have some strippers over to eden 2c. all are welcome.. howerver there will be no nudity. I plan on killing the bitches as soon as the walk in and proceding to cut their skin off while cumming in my duke issue spandex.. “


Innocent of the charges but not innocent individuals, though the media has glanced way past this.

But when was the last time that Black defendants received this same level of positive coverage by the media or the justice system? What case can you name?

In the OJ Simpson case the nation displayed a
reaction to seeing how dismayed whites were when the legal system worked for a Black man in the same way that it had worked for whites all too many times. The intelligence of the mostly Black jury was questioned by the media and became a national punch line on late night television.


The Rodney King case, which prompted the riots, had many
figured the case for police brutality was pretty obvious. Everything you needed to know was right there on video. Instead many white people accepted the LAPD’s defense that King was a threat and the Simi Valley jury’s acquittal of the officers. The juror’s intelligence was never questioned the way the jurors in the O.J. trial was.


Beyond this, how many cases have we heard where an ambiguous African American was the perpetrator only to learn that the actual criminal was the supposed victim. How many times has an African American been arrested based solely on this presumption, and the media demanded their conviction with the harshest penalties only to become completely silent when the truth becomes known?

Injustice is not a Black and White issue, according to the law. Inequality under the law is a fact of life. Now that former D.A. Nifong has been quickly disbarred, the alleged rapists decried innocent of their charges, purported millions paid to their families, and the original victim discredited by the media – who have released her name and image – what happens next?

[I have to mention that I have never heard of a case, no matter the outcome, where an alleged rape victim’s name, image and virtually their address has been released to the public and promoted on several broadcasts. It was an unheard of act, but in this case, for this woman, there was an exception of what was previously a media rule.]

Will the justice system and the media start treating all defendants the same? Will Blacks be defended vigorously when potentially involved in an event? Well just observe the coverage on the missing mother Jessie Davis. Perhaps the father-to-be is guilty, but the media seems sure of it. These kinds of cases often involve someone close to the victim so it could be. But if you compare the questions and amount of coverage being directed to the father-to-be versus the coverage and questions of the man whose entire family was found dead in a car, you see a big difference.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Labels: , , , , ,



Ask for ad rates

2 Comments:

At 6:36 PM, June 21, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

As soon as it was shown that these guys were falsely accused she ceased to be an "alleged rape victim" so she was fair game to show her face and name in the newspapers and print. My peronal opinion is that it is a bunch of politically correct crap not to release the names of alleged rape victims anyway. Why not keep the names of the alleged perpetraters out of the media also? I am sure this practice was promoted by some feminist group and our left leaning media bought right into it.

I am absolutely astounded when I see these guys getting out of prison after serving 18, 20 years for rapes they did not commit. In my opinion if you falsely accuse someone of rape you should be doing they same amount of time that the perpetrator would have received had he been convicted. And if the state puts an innocent guy in prison for this long they should pay dearly say $10 million. You can't get back lost years so the price should be steep

 
At 8:02 PM, June 21, 2007 , Blogger M. Vass said...

First let me thank you for your response on this subject.

While you are correct that once the charges were dropped she was technically not covered by the protections afforded to rape victims. It has been the common practice, and common courtesy, that the identity of the woman is not revealed. This case is not the first time that charges were dropped or proven wrong in a rape case. To my knowledge there has NEVER been a single case where any form of media has revealed the identity of the woman. Never since the victims have been protected. That’s whether the case was proven or not, whether the accusation was false or not. So the fact that it was done in this case is suspect.

As for the “Politically Correct crap” you refer to, the fact is that the identity of women are protected due to law. This law was passed decades ago, long before a thought like PC existed. The reason for the law was so that women who were traumatized by this violent personal attack would not be ostracized by the media for reporting a rape. Prior to this, in the past, lawyers would try the character of the woman in the public, and embarrass them in an attempt to defend their client. This process caused many women to not seek charges, thus letting vile criminals of the lowest caliber to continue to attack women.

Considering the ability of the media and the internet to transmit information on a 24/7, near instantaneous manner, your implied suggestion that women’s identities should be revealed means that a woman could have their identity showcased around the world, with any kind of embarrassing content attached to it – done with the thought that this would compel her to drop the case. That’s the equivalent of blackmail if I understand it correctly. And if such blackmail were to work, that criminal would be free to then go out and attack your mother, daughter, wife, girlfriend, son, brother, ect. I for one do not relish such a prospect.

I should also mention that to my knowledge no political group has disagreed with this policy ever. Nor is any group trying to change it, even after these events as its benefits are too great.

As to those falsely accused, what about those convicted of any crime they did not commit? Those convicted of murder and still denied the opportunity for DNA tests to absolutely prove their innocence? How many Black men, over centuries have been killed because a white woman said they did it? I think the book, To Kill A Mockingbird, clearly gives an example of that from not long ago. If the book is too long you can see the wonderful movie based on it.

My point is that there are many false accusations made in the law everyday. Rarely do those making such accusations go to jail. If the law were more harsh as you suggest there would have been more white women in jail cells for centuries, and still would be today. Considering the propensity of the American public to accept ANYONE claiming ‘a black guy did it’ I’m sure many more people would be suffering than you think.

And I will say again, these boys were not innocent. Review all my posts on the subject. Check all the links I have on this. Read the email one of the lacrosse players sent out that next morning. They may not have committed this crime, but they aren’t innocent.

I don’t condone a false accusation. But I am made ill by the response the media and general public displays when an African American, Hispanic or other minority accuses a White person of a crime. Even worse is the immediate response by the above to condemn, without proof, ANY minority on ANY crime.

That’s the inequality I am speaking of in this post. It’s the same issue you seem to have failed to notice in your comment. I assume that is the fault of my writing. For that I apologize. But I think it is clear now.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Ask for ad rates