Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Abortion and the 2008 election - results

The Presidential election was not the only thing that was decided in the elections on November 4th. Across the nation several states debated one of the more controversial issues in America since at least the 1970’s. Abortion.

The issue at hand in Colorado, South Dakota, and California essentially was the banning of abortion in all forms. As of 12pm I can say that in Colorado and South Dakota the ballot initiatives were soundly defeated. But California was still up in the air.

In Colorado the question for voters was

Defining “person” as at the moment of fertilization

This was defeated with a resounding 73% of no votes. So in Colorado, and as a legal example for the moment in the nation, life still begins at birth.

In South Dakota the question to voters was

Ban abortion except in the case of rape and/or the endangerment of the health of the mother [ie she will die otherwise]

Voters in this less dense than average state also rallied together for a 55% no vote. Obviously voters there feel that there are other reasons and circumstances that need to be included in any consideration of abortion.

But in California one of the most debated issues was on the ballot

Waiting period and notify parents of a minor prior to an abortion

As I stated that as of midnight this had not been resolved. This does not ban abortions, for minors or anyone else, but it is felt by some to overly restrict access to abortions. Effectively it achieves the same end as a ban. Considering how liberal California is on many issues this could go in any direction.

But overall no real headway has been made in the debate on abortion. It is still legal, and many find fault with the degree – or existence – that this medical procedure is used to.

With the election of a Democratic Congress, and an extremely liberal Democratic President who will likely replace at least 1 or 3 Supreme Court Justices there seems no question that nationally abortion will be here to stay. At least for 1 more year on a state by state level.

Do you agree with those votes? How would you voted on the California ballot?

Labels: , , , , , ,



Ask for ad rates

4 Comments:

At 12:28 PM, November 20, 2008 , Blogger M. Vass said...

Comments as found at abortionblog.net, where I am a contributing author.

Anonymous Says:
October 24th, 2008 at 2:01 am e
I disagree with abortion. It is not right. It is not a right. Anyone who says it is a right should have to witness an abortion being performed. Then they can come back and tell me if they still advocate murder.

 
At 12:28 PM, November 20, 2008 , Blogger M. Vass said...

Tiffany Stuart Says:
November 2nd, 2008 at 9:31 pm e
Wrote a letter to Obama about his abortion view

 
At 12:29 PM, November 20, 2008 , Blogger M. Vass said...

David Says:
November 12th, 2008 at 11:05 pm e
Riddle me this:

Why is it that our government will stop embryotic stemcell research that could save lives because it is against harming embriotic CELLS, but does nothing to stop the killing of fetuses?

 
At 12:30 PM, November 20, 2008 , Blogger M. Vass said...

OK, MY MISTAKE. These comments addressed the post Abortion - the 2008 election issues that is unspoken. I screwed up.

Rayther than delete them I will just repost them on where they belong.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Ask for ad rates