The Dow Jones Index does not lie

Unless one of the better turn arounds of the stock market history occurs in the next 10 minutes, the Dow Jones will have fallen several hundred points, around the range of 7900 or less (a mere 300 points from a target I predicted over 3 months ago). This is happening at the same time that the Senate has pass the economic stimulus package created by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, bloated by Democrats, and touted by President Obama. So I have to wonder, exactly which people involved with the economy think this is a good plan?

This plan, and the extensive bailouts that President Obama’s tax dodging Treasury Secretary Geithner, are proposing obviously have not convinced the critical group of Americans that good times are anywhere close to the horizon. Since these investors also represent a large portion of the small and mid-sized business owners in America, as well as the world, I expect only one thing. All the emphasis of gloom and fear drummed up by Democrats will actually come to pass. Just as a result of their actions, and not the inaction they claim.

Unemployment in the nation is bad. Not quite the nearly 11% level that the policies of the Carter Administration created, but President Obama and the Democrat-led Congress have just gotten started. We currently hover at 7.8% unemployment, with the seeming goal of 25% reached in the Great Depression getting closer to the crosshairs each day.

None of this has stopped any Democrat, including the President from pressing forward. We have waste and pet projects, call them earmarks by another name, and little hope of improvement. Just look at what is planned.

“$10 million for urban canals, $2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars, and $255 million for a polar icebreaker and other "priority procurements" by the Coast Guard.”

That says nothing of the $100 million to be spent on Honey bees and similar items I cannot imagine creating jobs.

“The plan that we've put forward will save or create 3 million to 4 million jobs over the next two years.” – President Obama

“The president's own economists, in a report prepared last month, stated, "It should be understood that that all of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant margins of error."

But the polispeak is great. The promises of improvement sound fantastic when you include supposed facts that no one can ever corroborate. And the inclusion of key words like “save” helps keep the polispeak from becoming an outright lie, while showing the absolute lack of confidence that the plans instill. Yet this is good enough for the average American that does not review transcripts nor listen intently to ever word. But those who invest and run companies do, more often than not.

“The economic stimulus bill would allocate about $20 billion to help hospitals and doctors transition from paper charts to electronic health records for their patients… By itself, the adoption of more health IT is generally not sufficient to produce significant cost savings, the Congressional Budget Office reported last year.”

Again it is the confusion of facts and expectations, without proof, that keep many Americans from noticing the horrendous ramifications of the stimulus package and continued bailouts. The examples are not limited to just these few statements, but a collection of comments to the public since Pelosi first stumbled into the idea of another stimulus package in October (then priced at $50 billion total), and the factual items in the nearly $900 billion (actually over $1 trillion when interest is included modestly) terms.

The Dow Jones Industrial index is a forward indicator of the mind of business and economic health. Often it overreacts to the actions around itself on any given day. And there will be more than enough pundits and economists declaring just that, if the major news media that has invested so much into President Obama bothers to investigate that much. But economists don’t work the stock market. Stock brokers and business owners do. And without the degrees, charts, and visions of Santa delivering a healthy economy they have concluded, since January 2nd, 2009 that things are going to only get worse.

So I ask you, who do you believe? Congress and the Executive Administration that routinely fail to pay their taxes, write bad checks, organize pay-offs, and lie about the job they were elected to do (Barney Frank)? Or the guy who signs your check, watches the economy in action every day at every tick on the Dow, and the guy that will give either of those 2 enough money to expand their business and employ more people?

I was a stockbroker, so my opinion is biased. But you can look at the facts and the carefully stated words for yourself. Just don’t look at the value of your 401K while you do so.

Obama Stimulus Package: an urgent need to do nothing

The more I hear about the Obama stimulus package, the less I like it. Yet it is the most “urgent” piece of legislation that his Administration is working on passing, immediately. Just as the $800 billion for the credit crisis had to be immediate.

And just as with the mortgage/credit bailout quick action without forethought provides for mistakes, waste and a few political amendments that no one will notice until after the fact.

As of right now, the Obama stimulus package is being referred to by President Obama as

“All we can do, those of us in Washington, is help create a favorable climate in which workers can prosper, businesses can thrive, and our economy can grow," Obama said. "And that's exactly what I intend to achieve - soon.”

Now think about this for a moment. The stimulus package is intended to avert a depression and reverse the recessionary trend currently happening. This is important to remember as I continue.

25% of the Obama stimulus package will not take effect until after 2 years have passed. That’s not my opinion, that’s from the White House itself. Thus the package is not immediate.

The package includes several hundred billion dollars for environmental studies. That also takes an extended amount of time, and provides nothing to the economy. But it does make the global warming crowd feel all warm and fuzzy.

The package requires that:

“Much of the spending would be for items such as health care, jobless benefits, food stamps and other such programs.”

Jobless benefits do not create jobs, and therefore does not help the economy. Food stamps do not create jobs and therefore does not help the economy. Healthcare could create jobs, except that the money allocated for that is to supplement the coverage and cost for those that have lost a job. Again it does not create anything.

And a huge portion of the stimulus package is targeted to give the public money. But that’s not exactly true. First you have to make less than $75,000 (or $150,000 for those filing joint). Second you must receive a paycheck. Third you will receive a discount on the federal taxes you pay – up to the first $8150 of your annual salary.

That last one is important. It means that if you get paid once a month (as an example), and in month 2 or 3 your income exceeds $8150 you will no longer get the benefit. Of course the entire benefit only amounts to about $120 a month anyway. Which should be plenty of money to go out and buy hoards of new items. Which would create new jobs.

Except that $120 a month isn’t much at all. For most major purchases, like a new TV that will work with the HD changeover, cost far more than a mere $500 (which would take 4 months to save up to and is not immediate). Add to that equation the fact that the average American has $6000 in debt, and with tens of thousands of jobs being lost so far in this month alone most are more concerned with lowering debt as opposed to buying a new shiny something to compete with the Jones’ next door.

So again this is not creating jobs.

But there is some portion of the funds that will go to small businesses. Roughly $2.7 billion dollars. Or in other words, next to nothing. And larger businesses will get money as well, if they can prove they can create jobs through Government approved calculations that have been proven to be next to impossible to qualify for.

But do not fear. The Government will be funding jobs via public works. Like in the time of FDR. Except that just like then, if nothing is being done to create private sector jobs, which the above proves it is not, when the Government stops the funding there are no jobs for people to apply for.

In essence, this is a political polispeak attempt to look good. The long term effects are negligible at best. The quiet side provisions are definitely not popular. In virtually every aspect it fails to create jobs, or spur consumer confidence. It fails at its immediate and definitive purpose, stimulus.

If this passes, Democrats in Congress and President Obama will look good. For a while. And Republicans will have yet another thing that will be blamed on them. And when the built in failure of the plan becomes apparent, Republicans will be the first people selected to blame for their disagreement.

What is needed is a stimulus plan. Not the word stimulus, not the projection of sending the public checks that will need to be paid back at some point in the future. Least of all is the need for the Government to take care of everyone as if they were children, which this package does in abundance.

I don’t want the Government to give me what it thinks I need. I want the ability to earn enough to make my own choice about what I actually need, and if I do well what I want.

All politicians should reject the Obama stimulus package. Democrats won’t. Most Republicans will. And it will get passed because there are more than enough Democrats who seek political gain over their constituents well being.

Not the definition of change most voters expected, but it is change indeed.

Abortion and the 2008 election - results

The Presidential election was not the only thing that was decided in the elections on November 4th. Across the nation several states debated one of the more controversial issues in America since at least the 1970’s. Abortion.

The issue at hand in Colorado, South Dakota, and California essentially was the banning of abortion in all forms. As of 12pm I can say that in Colorado and South Dakota the ballot initiatives were soundly defeated. But California was still up in the air.

In Colorado the question for voters was

Defining “person” as at the moment of fertilization

This was defeated with a resounding 73% of no votes. So in Colorado, and as a legal example for the moment in the nation, life still begins at birth.

In South Dakota the question to voters was

Ban abortion except in the case of rape and/or the endangerment of the health of the mother [ie she will die otherwise]

Voters in this less dense than average state also rallied together for a 55% no vote. Obviously voters there feel that there are other reasons and circumstances that need to be included in any consideration of abortion.

But in California one of the most debated issues was on the ballot

Waiting period and notify parents of a minor prior to an abortion

As I stated that as of midnight this had not been resolved. This does not ban abortions, for minors or anyone else, but it is felt by some to overly restrict access to abortions. Effectively it achieves the same end as a ban. Considering how liberal California is on many issues this could go in any direction.

But overall no real headway has been made in the debate on abortion. It is still legal, and many find fault with the degree – or existence – that this medical procedure is used to.

With the election of a Democratic Congress, and an extremely liberal Democratic President who will likely replace at least 1 or 3 Supreme Court Justices there seems no question that nationally abortion will be here to stay. At least for 1 more year on a state by state level.

Do you agree with those votes? How would you voted on the California ballot?